language: Deutsch   Français   italiano   Español   Português   日本語   russian   arabic   norwegian   swedish   danish   Nederlands   finland   ireland   English  

Yahoo Admits New Hack of 1 BILLION Accounts » Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!Yahoo Admits New Hack of 1 BILLION Accounts » Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind! us digital millennium copyright act yahoo answers

Yahoo Admits New Hack of 1 BILLION Accounts Massive breach separate from hack of 500 million accounts announced in September Mikael Thalen | - December 14, 2016 Comments Image Credits: Flickr.

Internet giant Yahoo revealed Wednesday that more than 1 billion user accounts were compromised in August 2013.

The massive breach, separate from the hack of 500 million accounts announced last September, may include everything from names, email addresses and telephone numbers to birthdays and MD5 hashed passwords.

“Yahoo believes an unauthorized third party, in August 2013, stole data associated with more than one billion user accounts,” Yahoo’s chief information security officer Bob Lord wrote. “The company has not been able to identify the intrusion associated with this theft. Yahoo believes this incident is likely distinct from the incident the company disclosed on September 22, 2016.”

The company says it’s in the process of notifying potentially affected users while taking steps to secure accounts through required password changes.

“Yahoo encourages users to review all of their online accounts for suspicious activity and to change their passwords and security questions and answers for any other accounts on which they use the same or similar information used for their Yahoo account,” Lord wrote. “The company further recommends that users avoid clicking links or downloading attachments from suspicious emails and that they be cautious of unsolicited communications that ask for personal information.”

The newly announced breach will undoubtedly fuel further distrust in the company, which has been plagued by bad publicity over its security practices.

Last October it was also  reported that Yahoo secretly built a custom software program on behalf of US intelligence to search every incoming email.

Related Articles Breaking: 87% Of Facebook Is Bot Simulation For VR Science & Tech Comments Britain to ban sale of all diesel and petrol cars and vans from 2040 Science & Tech Comments Scientists Warn That The Countdown To The Extinction of The Human Race Is Accelerating Science & Tech Comments Elon Musk Says Mark Zuckerberg Naive On A.I. Dangers Science & Tech Comments Ransomware Attacks: Victims Have Paid More Than $25 Million Since 2014 Science & Tech Comments Comments Newsletter Signup Popup X CNN is ISIS Infowars Hero Ad Today on the Show Today on the Alex Jones Show Watch the Show Watch Now Click to Watch Top Stories Top Stories Watch Live: DNC Panics As Democrat Operative Caught Fleeing the Country Infowars Folk Song Cover Contest Is Blowing Up The Internet Foxconn to Build Manufacturing Plant in Wisconsin REVEALE jowjcybc. moncler hat mens ebayD: Amazon’s Stealth Health Care Operation Foxconn to build $10B plant in Wisconsin employing 13,000 Why Are The Elites Evacuating The United States And Europe? Most Popular Signup Get Informed Get the latest breaking news & specials from Alex Jones and the Infowars crew.

From the store From Our Store Visit Store Your Price: On Sale:

Buy Now Learn More Watch the news Watch the News Nightly News for Tuesday, July 25, 2017: Sessions' Drug Obsession: War On Constitution Tuesday: The Alex Jones Show. Everything You Need to Know About America’s Next AG Nightly News for Monday, July 24, 2017: The Satanic Establishment In Full Blown Panic Over Trump Monday: The Alex Jones Show. Pastor Warns Of Planned Sudden Removal Of Trump Sunday: The Alex Jones Show. Europe Replacement Plan Nightly News for Friday, July 21, 2017: INVASION-21: UN Document Plans People Replacement War Against West Friday: The Alex Jones Show. Globalist Agent Sean Spicer Resigns As Deep State Collapses Nightly News for Thursday, July 20, 2017: Liberals Fully Triggered Over Trump's Voter Integrity Commission Thursday: The Alex Jones Show. Attacks On Trump Get Desperate As The Old Guards Of Globalism Collapse Nightly News for Wednesday, July 19, 2017: Republicans Blame Democrats For Their Failure Wednesday: The Alex Jones Show. Republicans Embrace Failing Obamacare, Trump Says Let It Fail Nightly News for Tuesday, July 18, 2017: #FakeGOP: Voted Repeal When Obama Would Veto, Now Change Their Vote Tuesday: The Alex Jones Show. Muslim Hordes Destroy Europe/ Elon Musk Warns AI Could Destroy the World Full Show Nightly News for Monday, July 17, 2017: President Trump Declares July 17th Made In America Day Monday: The Alex Jones Show. Trump Poll Numbers Sky Rocket, MSM In Total Panic Meltdown Sunday: The Alex Jones Show. Deep State/ Democrats Plans To Overthrow Trump And Establish A One-Party Dictatorship Exposed Friday: The Infowars Nightly News. Dem Lawyer Warns of Expanding Criminal Law To Target Political Enemies Friday: The Alex Jones Show. Six Months Of Victory: President Trump Is Destroying The Globalist Agenda Nightly News for Thursday, July 13, 2017: President Trump Unites Country To Fight Human Trafficking Thursday: The Alex Jones Show. Powerful Broadcast Full Show: Nancy Pelosi Anoints Herself Savior Of The Democrats, Megyn Kelly’s Nose Dive Goes Into Hyperspace And More Nightly News for Tuesday, July 25, 2017: Sessions' Drug Obsession: War On Constitution Tuesday: The Alex Jones Show. Everything You Need to Know About America’s Next AG Nightly News for Monday, July 24, 2017: The Satanic Establishment In Full Blown Panic Over Trump Monday: The Alex Jones Show. Pastor Warns Of Planned Sudden Removal Of Trump 1 2 3 4 5 Featured Videos FEATURED VIDEOS Exclusive: Roger Stone Reveals Sessions On Way Out - Here's The Short List For Next AG - See the rest on the Alex Jones YouTube channel. Exclusive: Inside The Trump Purge Of Traitors - See the rest on the Alex Jones YouTube channel. ILLUSTRATION Illustration Poll POLLS The app © 2017 is a Free Speech Systems, LLC Company. All rights reserved. Digital Millennium Copyright Act Notice. Radio Video PPTV Store Infowars Life T.O.S. Archive Watch Alex Jones Show Most Recent D.M.C.A. Corrections About Alex Jones Show Subscribe Contact © 2017 is a Free Speech Systems, LLC Company. All rights reserved. Digital Millennium Copyright Act Notice. Home Radio Show ▼ Watch About Alex Jones Radio Show Archive Newsletter Sign Up News ▼ Special Reports U.S. News World News Economy Government World at War Health Science & Technology Globalism Hot News Videos ▼ All Videos Nightly News Store ▼ Store Classic Store Top Stories Breaking News Contact ▼ Affiliates Contributors Social Media Bio-True Selenium Limited Advanced Release 24.95 19.95 Never synthetic, Infowars Life Bio-True Selenium is extracted from 100% certified organic mustard seed, functions as a powerful antioxidant and supports a healthy thyroid and immune system. https://www./wp-content/uploads/2015/10/selenium-200.jpg Outdoor Pack – Emric’s Essentials 39.90 31.92 Perfect For Your Everyday Outdoor Needs! https://www./wp-content/uploads/2015/10/emricsoutdoorkit-200.jpg Bio-PCA 39.95 19.95 Start supporting the appearance of healthy hair, skin, and nails with Bio-PCA https://www./wp-content/uploads/2015/10/bio-pca-300.jpg Survival Shield X-2 39.95 29.95 Leading the way into the next generation of super high quality nascent iodine, the new Infowars Life Survival Shield X-2 is now here. https://www./wp-content/uploads/2016/02/x2-200.jpg Super Male Vitality 69.95 59.95 The all new and advanced Super Male Vitality formula uses the newest extraction technology with even more powerful concentrations of various herbs and extracts designed to be even stronger. https://www./wp-content/uploads/2016/02/smv-200.jpg Brain Force Plus 39.95 39.95 Flip the switch and supercharge your state of mind with the all-new Brain Force PLUS: 20% more capsules and a critically enhanced formula featuring a brand new ingredient and increased potency – all for the same low price. https://www./wp-content/uploads/2016/02/bf-300-1.jpg
us digital millennium copyright act yahoo answers

moncler sweater
replica moncler jackets suppliers
us digital millennium copyright act search engine
moncler mens
moncler womens jackets On the websites router e in a web directory which of SCHOOL The University of Texas at San Antonio- San Antonio COURSE TITLE IS 3033 TYPE Test Prep UPLOADED BY canero96 PAGES 6 Click to edit the document details

This preview shows pages 2–4 . Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document On the Website's router E. In a Web directory Which of the following is FALSE about techno stress? A. Its symptoms include aggravation, hostility toward humans, impatience, and fatigue. B. Affected people start to behave like computers, devoid of emotions. C. It is related to high levels of job turnover in the computer industry. D. It is induced by computer use. E. It causes elevated levels of drug and alcohol abuse. United States privacy laws are largely based on the _________________ report. A. exclusive privacy B. Sarbanes-Oxley C. Fair Information Practices D. Mills-Pearson E. confidentiality The ethical principle that calls ranking alternatives before making a decision is called the ______________. A. alternative path principle B. Immanuel Kant's categorical imperative C.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Golden Rule D. utilitarian principle E. utility principle Which government act was enacted in 1996 to protect your medical records? A. HIPA B. FERPA C. HIPAA D. TIO E. HRSA Nearly 80 percent of the Internet searches conducted use ___________, which makes it the largest data repository in history. A. Bing B. Google C. Yahoo! D. Xfinity E. Netscape When thinking about downloading and using a photo off the Internet, don't forget the ethical __________ lunch rule. A. inexpensive B. gluten free C. fancy D. no free E. fat free Which of the following adjusts copyright laws to the Internet age by making it illegal to make, distribute, or use devices that circumvent technology-based protections of copyrighted materials? A. Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 B. Electronic Communications Privacy Act C. Privacy Act D. Digital Millennium Copyright Act E. This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document. TERM Fall '08 PROFESSOR STAFF TAGS Law, Privacy law, data storage costs, mobile device growth Click to edit the document details Share this link with a friend: Copied! Report View Full Document

"Smart Cities" Are Too Smart for Your Privacy By Albert Gidari on February 20, 2017 at 5:39 pm

No one wants to live in a “dumb” city.  But I question whether anyone ought to want to live in a really smart city either.  I’d prefer to just live in a smarter city -- one that puts my privacy and security first before rolling out ubiquitous sensors and broad-scale data collection in the name of some larger public good.

I understand the promise of smart cities and I personally embrace technology as a means to improve our lives. But privacy so far has been an afterthought in the smart city discussion, if it is even considered at all.  Take, for example President Obama’s “Smart City” Initiative announced in the Fall of 2015:

Today, the Administration is announcing a new “Smart Cities” Initiative that will invest over $160 million in federal research and leverage more than 25 new technology collaborations to help local communities tackle key challenges such as reducing traffic congestion, fighting crime, fostering economic growth, managing the effects of a changing climate, and improving the delivery of city services. . . . An emerging community of civic leaders, data scientists, technologists, and companies are joining forces to build “Smart Cities” – communities that are building an infrastructure to continuously improve the collection, aggregation, and use of data to improve the life of their residents – by harnessing the growing data revolution, low-cost sensors, and research collaborations, and doing so securely to protect safety and privacy.  

That’s a smart investment in the future, but in over 4000 words of new grants, proposals and collaborations with local communities, the word “privacy” was mentioned in the document exactly once in that hortatory preamble.  In short, it was an afterthought, not the predicate for the program.

Many cities around the world are building technology infrastructures in public places that will collect vast amounts of data for a variety of “public good” reasons. But regulatory agencies or those in charge of acquiring technology or deploying “smart” services often don’t consider privacy impacts or risks. To illustrate the point, a few weeks ago, I submitted comments to the New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission on its proposal to collect precise drop-off data from for-hire services like Uber, Lyft and others. I asked why the government needed to know precisely where customers got picked up and dropped off by for-hire services when the ostensible purpose of the rule was to reduce driver fatigue.

The Commission had not addressed the privacy implications of the proposed rule in its public notice for comment.  Thus, it was no surprise that it ignored the many privacy concerns raised by commenters, passing the rule unanimously after a brief public hearing. No doubt trip data can be useful for many purposes (Uber, for example, helps cities by providing aggregated data for transportation planning purposes), but gauging driver fatigue is about as remote as you can get. One can surmise that the Commission probably had ulterior motives for insisting on the data collection, but it takes no guess at all to understand that it didn’t particularly care about the privacy of Uber or Lyft users.

The Commission was not interested in balancing regulatory needs against individual privacy risks--risks the Commission knew about because its prior disclosure of trip data to data analysts showed how easy it was to identify individual riders. The Commission conducted no privacy impact assessment; considered no alternatives with lesser privacy impacts; and failed to inform the public how long it would keep the data, with what other government agencies it would share it and for what purposes, or to whom it would disclose it such as in response to public records act requests or for commercial use. The Commission has no privacy officer and no privacy policy to govern its conduct. It is accountable to no one. It is the epitome of what a “dumb city” agency looks like in our present and future “smart city” lives absent a regulatory privacy epiphany.

Dumb agency rules are bad enough when it comes to privacy, but some privacy advocates are more concerned more about the malevolent possible uses of smart city technology. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) recently published a blog post about the San Jose City Council proposal to install over 39,000 “smart streetlights.”  While “smart streetlights” themselves are not problematic, the lights have ports that can accommodate video cameras and microphones.  EFF urged the San Jose City Council to adopt an ordinance to ensure democratic control of all of the city’s “surveillance technology decisions—including whether to plug spy cameras into the ports of smart streetlights in the future.”  EFF opposes what it calls the ever-expanding “the web of street-level surveillance ” in cities today with deployment of automated license readers, cell site simulators, CCTV, facial recognition and other surveillance technologies. It wants to see democratic control of decision-making to acquire or deploy surveillance technology and privacy by design features to prevent mission creep for services like smart lights.

The fact is that there is an astonishing lack of privacy law applicable to most aspects of smart city data collection and use.  Even when cities venture into providing broadband Internet access in competition with commercial providers, the rules that apply to the city are unclear at best.  A recent report about the multi-year effort by the town of Concord, Massachusetts, to establish a broadband communications infrastructure had me wondering about the privacy rules that would apply to 100-mile fiber optic network the city built as a backbone for a smart grid and delivery high-speed Internet access to homes and businesses.

For one thing, all providers of broadband Internet access are required to build in wiretap capabilities under the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA), 47 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq.  There is no exception for municipalities providing such services.  That being the case, one wonders exactly how federal, state and local authorities will use the back door in a municipal network. How will municipalities execute wiretaps or obtain customer information from their own municipal provider?  Will the municipal provider be transparent with its customers and provide notice of such requests where lawful much as other commercial providers do today?  A smart city would work that out in advance of deploying services.

For another thing, cities are not subject to suit under the federal wiretap law for wrongfully intercepting and disclosing communications between citizens according to the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. See Seitz v. City of Elgin , 719 F.3d 654 (7th Cir. 2013). To explain, even though the relief section of the Wiretap Act says that a claim may be brought against a “person or entity” that violates the Act, the substantive prohibitions in section 2511 of Title 18 apply only to a “person.”  According to Seitz , Congress did not include cities in the definition of “person.”  The Sixth Circuit reached a different conclusion a decade earlier, so at best, there is an apparent split in the circuits, but the Seventh Circuit probably has it right. See Adams v. City of Battle Creek , 250 F.3d 980 (6th Cir. 2001). Legislative arcania aside, it is a serious issue for municipal providers, raising concerns ranging from E&O insurance to qualified privileges and immunity to employee misconduct to contingent liability and litigation risks.

The answers for smart cities may be to provide a dumb pipe, but don’t bet on that future, especially because providing such services will raise revenue for cities from subscription fees to advertising and analytics dollars.  Some cities may choose to outsource all of the platform or network operations of a smart city, and that also will raise a host of privacy questions about ownership and use of data.  

Smart city privacy concerns will not be going away soon, but the real risk is that the really smart city arrives before the law catches up to it or we realize how powerful the data collection and processing has become. It would be much smarter and better to develop a set of comprehensive privacy rules to govern the advent of smart cities and to limit municipal collection, use and disclosure of user information before it is too late.  

Last point. Haven’t private companies already made our homes smart and aren’t they already competing to make cities smart too?  Sure. But those providers already are subject to privacy laws that provide remedies for security breaches or disclosures of personal information. States hold private companies to standards that they don’t apply to other state agencies.  When I sent my comments on the New York Taxi & Limousine Commission proposal to the New York Attorney General’s office for consumer protection and asked them to ensure the City protected consumers by addressing privacy concerns, I received an email thanking me for my comments and telling me that my concerns “have been duly noted and will be kept on file for future reference.”  We need smarter cities and we need government that is smarter about the privacy risks to, and concerns of, their constituents.

Focus Areas:  Privacy Related Topics:  CALEA Government Surveillance consumer privacy Add new comment Your name E-mail The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly. Comment * Notify me when new comments are posted Once you hit Save, your comment will be held for moderation before being published. You will not see a confirmation message once you hit the Save button but please be assured your comment has been submitted and we will review it. What code is in the image? * Enter the characters shown in the image.